Publish by

Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board About Aims & Scope


Original Article Open Access


Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits

Ayman El-Sayed Taha, Fawzy Ali Abd El-Ghany.

Abstract
A total number of 1833 day old chicks of mixed sex of Mandarah (MM), El-Salam (SS) were used as well as their crosses and reciprocal crosses. Body weight (BW), daily weight gain (WG), relative growth rate (RGR), feed consumption (FC), feed conversion ratio (FCR), shank length (SL), keel length (KL) and body circumferences (BC) were evaluated among the four studied lines form hatch up to 20 weeks of age. SM cross showed superiority of BW with positive heterosis percentages; while negative heterosis percentages were recorded for MS cross. Also, SM cross recorded the highest WG at 4, 12 and 16 weeks of age with high positive heterosis percentages up to 16 weeks of age, high overall RGR from 0-8 and 0-12 weeks of age with corresponding heterosis percentages (0.46 and 0.73%). SM cross showed the highest FC compared to other lines and recorded positive heterosis percentage. On the other hand, SM cross and SS line showed the highest significant differences for SL and KL at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of age with positive heterosis percentages for SM line, but no effect for crossing present on BC. Positive maternal effects were recorded for most of the growth traits. It was concluded that, using El-Salam strain as a sire line and Mandarah strain as a dam line resulted in SM cross of improved growth performance traits.

Key words: El-Salam, Mandarah, Crossing, Growth traits, Heterosis, Maternal effect.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
Print this article Print this Article
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Export to
Export to
Related Records
 Articles by Ayman El-Sayed Taha
Articles by Fawzy Ali Abd El-Ghany
on Google
on Google Scholar
Article Statistics
 Viewed: 2982
Downloaded: 564
Cited: 0


REFERENCES
Abd El-Gawad, E. M., Khalil, A. Z. and Balat, M. M. 1979. Genetic analysis of new breed of chickens. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 8: 303-314.
Abou El-Ella, N. 1982. A comparative study on the performance potentially of four locally developed strains and their F1 crosses. M.A.Sci. University of Alexandria, Egypt.
Adedeji, T. A., Adebambo, O. A., Peters, S. O., Ojedapo, L. O. and Ige, A. O. 2006. Growth performance of crossbred and purebred chickens resulting from different sire strain in a humid tropical environment. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 5 (8): 674-678.
Adnan, A. A. M. 2003. Effect of diallel crosses on poultry performance. M.A.Sci., Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University.
Alewi, M. and Melesse, A. 2013. Evaluating the growth performance of local kei chickens and their F1-crosses with Rhode Island Red and Fayoumi breeds in watershed areas of Guraghe administrative zone, southern Ethiopia. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 16: 39 – 50.
Barbato, G. F. and Vasilatos, R. Y. 1991. Sex-linked and maternal effects on growth in chickens. Poult Sci. 70(4):709-18. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
Bekele, F., Ådnøy, T., Gjøen, H. M., Kathle, J. and Abebe, G. 2010. Production performance of dual purpose crosses of two indigenous with two exotic chicken breeds in sub-tropical environment. International Journal of Poultry Science 9 (7): 702-710. [DOI via Crossref]   
Broody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold Pub. Crop., N.Y., U.S.A.
Dickerson, G. E. 1992. Manual for evaluation of selection theory in poultry. Genet. Today. 3: 747-761.
Emmerson, D. A., Anthony, N. B. and Nestor, K. E. 1991. Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 11. Evidence of nonadditive genetic variation. Poult. Sci. 70: 1084-1091.
Iraqi, M. M., Hanafi, M. S., EL-Moghazy, G. M., El-Kotait, A. H. and Abdel A'al, M. H. 2011. Estimation of crossbreeding effects for growth and immunological traits in a crossbreeding experiment involving two local strains of chickens. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23 (4). From http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/iraq23082.htm
Keambou, T. C., Manjeli, Y., Boukila, B., Mboumba, S., Mezui Mezui, T. and Hako Touko, B. A. 2010. Heterosis and reciprocal effects of growth performances in F1 crosses generations of Local x Hubbard chicken in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (1). From http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/1/keam22011.htm
Khalil, M. H., Hermes, I. H. and Al-Homodan, A. H. 1999. Estimation of heterotic components for growth and livability traits in a cross breeding experiment of Saudi chickens with white leghorn. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 19(3): 491-507.
Laila, M. A., Goher, Mohamed,T. H. and Riad, S. A. 1996. Effect of crossing on body measurements, body conformation and dressing percent of some local and foreign breeds of chickens. Egypt. J. Agric. Res. 74 (2): 469-480.
Liu, G., Dunnington, E. A. and Siegel, P. B. 1995. Growth related traits in body weight selected lines and their crosses reared under different nutritional regimes. Br. Poult. Sci. 36:209–219. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
Mahmoud, T. H., Kosba, M. A., Hamdy, S. M. and Eturky, A. L. 1981. Hybrid vigor potency ratio in performance of crossbreds from four local breeds of chickens. 1- Body measurements and dressing percent. Agric. Res. Rev., Cairo. 59 (6): 197-198.
Mandour, M. A., Abd-Allah, G. A. and Sharaf, M. M. 1996. Effect of cross breeding in some carcass traits of native and standard breeds of chickens. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 16 (1): 171-185.
Mandour, M. A., Sharaf, M. M., Kosba, M. A. and El-Naggar, N. M. 1992. Estimation of combining ability and heterosis for some economic traits in local and commercial broiler strains of chickens from a full chilled cross. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 12; 57-78.
Merat, P., Minivelle, F., Bordas, A. and Coquerelle, G. 1994 Heterosis in normal versus dwarf laying hens. Poult. Sci. 73 (1): 1-6.
Mohammed, M. D., Abdalsalam, Y. I., Kheir A. M, Jim-yu, W. and Hussein, M. H. 2005. Growth performance x Exotic crosses of chickens and evaluation of general and specific combining ability under Sudan condition. International Journal of Poultry science 4 (7): 468-471. [DOI via Crossref]   
Ndegwa, J. M., Mead, R., Norrish, P. and Shephered, D. D. 2012. Growth Characteristics of Six Reciprocal Crosses of Kenyan Indigenous Chicken. Journal of Agricultural Science Vol. 4, No. 6.
Padhi, M. K., Singh, B. P., Verma, S. V. S., Bist, G. S. and Singh, B. 1997. Combining ability analysis of meat quality traits in broiler chickens. Indian Journal of poultry science 32: 3, 296-300.
Razuki, W. M. and AL-Shaheen, S. A. 2011. Use of Full Diallel Cross to Estimate Crossbreeding Effects in Laying Chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 10 (3): 197-204. [DOI via Crossref]   
Saleh, K. and Farghly, M. 1988. The effect of crossbreeding on growth traits in chicken. Com. Sci & Dev. Res., 22: 153-170.
SAS. 2004. Statistical Analysis System, Statistical user's Guide. INT., Cary, NC. USA.
Sheridan, A. K. 1981. Crossbreeding and heterosis. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 49:131–144.
Sola-Ojo, F. E., Ayorinde, K. L. and Toye, A. A. 2012. A Comparative Study of Growth Performance and Feed Efficiency in Dominant Black strain, Fulani Ecotype chicken and Progeny from their Reciprocal Crosses. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 2(2), pp. 120-125.
Taha, A. E. 2005. Genetic variations among colored varieties of Coturnix. M.V.Sc. Fac. of Vet. Med., Alex. Univ. Egypt.
Willham, R. L. and Pollak, E. 1985. Heterosis and crossbreeding. Dairy Sci. 68:2411–2417.
Ye, X., Anderson, J. W., Noble, D. O., Zhu, J. and Nestor, K. E. 1997. Influence of crossing a line selected for increased shank width and a commercial sire line on performance and walking ability of turkeys. Poult. Sci. 76(10):1327-1331.
Youssao, I. A. K., Senou. M., Dahouda, M., Kpodékon, M. T., Djenontin, J., Idrissou N. D., Bonou, G. A., Tougan, U. P., Ahounou, S., Assogba, H. M., Bankolé, E., Rognon, X. and Tixier-Boichard, M. 2009. Genetic Improvement of Local Chickens by Crossing with the Label Rouge (T55XSA51): Growth Performances and Heterosis Effects. International Journal of Poultry Science 8 (6): 536-544. [DOI via Crossref]   

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Taha AE, El-Ghany FAA. Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits. AJVS. 2013; 39(1): 18-30.



Web Style

Taha AE, El-Ghany FAA. Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits. www.scopemed.org/?mno=41249 [Access: September 23, 2017].



AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Taha AE, El-Ghany FAA. Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits. AJVS. 2013; 39(1): 18-30.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Taha AE, El-Ghany FAA. Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits. AJVS. (2013), [cited September 23, 2017]; 39(1): 18-30.



Harvard Style

Taha, A. E. & El-Ghany, F. A. A. (2013) Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits. AJVS, 39 (1), 18-30.



Turabian Style

Taha, Ayman El-Sayed, and Fawzy Ali Abd El-Ghany. 2013. Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 39 (1), 18-30.



Chicago Style

Taha, Ayman El-Sayed, and Fawzy Ali Abd El-Ghany. "Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits." Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences 39 (2013), 18-30.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Taha, Ayman El-Sayed, and Fawzy Ali Abd El-Ghany. "Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits." Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences 39.1 (2013), 18-30. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Taha, A. E. & El-Ghany, F. A. A. (2013) Improving Production Traits for El-salam and Mandarah Chicken Strains by Crossing I- Estimation of Crossbreeding Effects for Growth Production Traits. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 39 (1), 18-30.



AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed In

ScopeMed

IndexScholar



The articles in Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Science are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.